Started By
Message

re: This class is terrible

Posted on 2/2/17 at 3:35 pm to
Posted by TigerCruise
Virginia Beach, VA
Member since Oct 2013
11898 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

Yeah.

I'd say you're missing a lot. Like 75% of the picture.

But I wouldn't worry about it.

You're not meant to think this through any better than you have.


Someone piss in your cheerios?

I'm simply stating that a 48th ranked class is awful when you sign 25 players. You guys can shite on the recruiting rankings all you want but we had a number of flips at the last second and from what I can see we have ONE 4 star recruit in the entire class.

So we have 24 diamonds in the rough?

I don't buy it.
Posted by wubilli
Columbia
Member since Apr 2014
5517 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 3:39 pm to
Had Petry not been down graded from a 4 star to a 3 star in Rivals the ranking for Mizzou would have been 30.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter