Started By
Message
re: This class is terrible
Posted on 2/2/17 at 12:34 pm to JesusQuintana
Posted on 2/2/17 at 12:34 pm to JesusQuintana
So Clark is a 2*? Lol. First team all state in Texas in 6A. 1800 yards, 18 TDs in 10 games...and he's a 2*?
Cross specifically mentioned that Whiteside is the steal of the class. He's a 2*?
Gillespie is a 2*?
These guys were never evaluated. Simply had a star rating slapped on them based on who they committed to.
Cross specifically mentioned that Whiteside is the steal of the class. He's a 2*?
Gillespie is a 2*?
These guys were never evaluated. Simply had a star rating slapped on them based on who they committed to.
1
Posted on 2/2/17 at 1:05 pm to JesusQuintana
Clark was rated so low because of chance of maybe not qualifying until his senior year when he inked the SAT. His real size they say is 5'7 and 147 pounds hurt him also, but this kid plays bigger and taller.
Whiteside's height hurt him, but this kid is strong as an ox and hard to move plus he is a weight room freak.(On paper I say that he's a generic version of Aaron Donald of the Rams) Not saying that he will be good like Donald.
Gillespie was just a kid they probably slipped on in the ratings, because they say he might be just as fast as any kid on Mizzou's team and he will probably be their most athletic safety along with Ulmer. Some teams in Florida that played against him says that he played like a 4*
Whiteside's height hurt him, but this kid is strong as an ox and hard to move plus he is a weight room freak.(On paper I say that he's a generic version of Aaron Donald of the Rams) Not saying that he will be good like Donald.
Gillespie was just a kid they probably slipped on in the ratings, because they say he might be just as fast as any kid on Mizzou's team and he will probably be their most athletic safety along with Ulmer. Some teams in Florida that played against him says that he played like a 4*
This post was edited on 2/2/17 at 1:08 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News