Started By
Message

re: Obama's Farewell Address and what you will remember him for.

Posted on 1/13/17 at 12:08 pm to
Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 12:08 pm to
quote:


Carry on.


Great contribution and excellent counter-point.

By your name I'm assuming there's no bias toward nuke power -- insert series of laughing emojis (never mind, I'm an adult male).

Nuke power is stupid and wrong on so many levels.

It's an unnecessary dangerous risk. It's dirty. It's expensive.

Nuclear plants are prohibitively dangerous and prohibitively expensive. It's the epitome of centralization of energy. Waste storage is toxic for thousands of years. And so on. Lots more to the argument, but it's not needed, is it? No.

The only arguments for its 'goodness' are shortsighted and lack honesty.

Hashtag: fatguyslovenumberedmenus


Posted by navynuke
Member since Jun 2016
4975 posts
Posted on 1/13/17 at 12:26 pm to
You are stupid and wrong on so many levels.

quote:

It's an unnecessary dangerous risk.


Dangerous? There are so many holes to be shot in that but I will start here. Look up negative coefficient of reactivity and get back with me.

quote:

Expensive


Offset by grid reliability.


quote:

It's dirty.



To achieve a comparable generating capability to most PWRs, a CFB or stoker fired unit would have to burn about 1.4 million tons of coal or coal/coke blend per year. The associated emissions alone exceed the danger of storing spent fuel in a dry cask or a cooling pool and we havent discussed the disposal of combustion products.

Hashtag: ihavenofrickingcluewhatiamtalkingaboutandloveskinnyjeansandappletinis
This post was edited on 1/13/17 at 12:35 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter