re: Why is Smarts staff able to recruit better than Richts?

quote:

---

Not comparable? UGA is currently third, and the difference between 3rd and 7th is normally like one blue chip guy or MAYBE two

---

Instead of just looking at rankings, which is stupid, why don't you look at overall score? Ya know..since that is a more accurate indicator across different years.

Butch's first full cycle in 14 (32 players):
5*- 0
4*- 16
3*- 16
Total score: 274.76
Avg player: 89.51

Kirby's first full cycle in 17 currently (20 currently):
5*- 2
4*- 15
3*- 3
Total score: 291.11
Avg player: 93.52

So to sum up butch signed THIRTY TWO guys, nearly half of which were 3*, and ended with a score of 274. Kirby, with over a month still to go and several big fish out there, already has more 5* and comparable 4* with 12 LESS players. And the total score totally shits on butch's class and average player ranking blows it out of the water.

Anyone thinking butch and kirby's first full classes are even remotely similar is simply an idiot, but that's par for the course for scarletfire.

Btw kirby's average player ranking is 2nd nationally right now only behind Ohio State, which has a sickening six 5* out of 17 recruits.