Started By
Message
re: '16 Bama and '95 Nebraska. Who ya got?
Posted on 11/27/16 at 8:04 pm to arwicklu
Posted on 11/27/16 at 8:04 pm to arwicklu
The point of my OP was not necessarily who would win in a matchup. The phrasing was ambiguous enough to get there, though.
The point was more along the lines of who was more dominant in their season, and I still go with Nebraska. Kind of like comparing the 70's Steelers and the 00's Patriots. Pats would kill them, but the Steelers are still the greatest collection of comparative talent I think the NFL has ever seen. (And that sucks to say as a Cowboys fan.)
Not that it is definitive, but I ran a quick pivot table on the rosters of 1995 Nebraska and 2016 Bama. Here is what you get.
The point was more along the lines of who was more dominant in their season, and I still go with Nebraska. Kind of like comparing the 70's Steelers and the 00's Patriots. Pats would kill them, but the Steelers are still the greatest collection of comparative talent I think the NFL has ever seen. (And that sucks to say as a Cowboys fan.)
Not that it is definitive, but I ran a quick pivot table on the rosters of 1995 Nebraska and 2016 Bama. Here is what you get.
This post was edited on 11/27/16 at 8:12 pm
1
Posted on 11/27/16 at 8:29 pm to Ag Zwin
I think it's clear that punters are the big difference maker here.
Dang, Bama. Your punters are beasts.
Dang, Bama. Your punters are beasts.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News