Started By
Message
re: Why do Bama RBs grossly under perform at the next level?
Posted on 10/27/16 at 12:13 am to JuiceTerry
Posted on 10/27/16 at 12:13 am to JuiceTerry
quote:
Most RBs in the league. Twice as many as LSU. Your troll job is terrible, idiot.
Spencer Ware 492
Jeremy Hill 439
Alfred Blue 161
Total 1,092
Beef Jerkey Lacy 360
Boring-arse Ingram 334
TJ Who? 280
The Savior Henry 161
Total 1135
1135-1092= 43 more yards and that is with an extra set of legs running the ball. It basically takes you one more player to equal the output of our former players. I don't think that fits the definition of efficiency.
It goes back to production. And like all of those links claim, as well, UA RBs just don't get the job done at the next level for whatever reasons.
Can't be a troll if it's the truth, bud. But the truth hurts sometimes, ya know?
This post was edited on 10/27/16 at 12:30 am
2
Posted on 10/27/16 at 12:17 am to Errerrerrwere
Damn. Those are some shitty LSU running backs. Jeremy Hill cost his team a shot at the Super Bowl last year. Sad.
Also, I didn't realize that Bama really does have twice as many RBs in the league as LSU. Incredible.
Also, I didn't realize that Bama really does have twice as many RBs in the league as LSU. Incredible.
Posted on 10/27/16 at 2:59 am to Errerrerrwere
quote:
Spencer Ware 492
Jeremy Hill 439
Alfred Blue 161
Total 1,092
Beef Jerkey Lacy 360
Boring-arse Ingram 334
TJ Who? 280
The Savior Henry 161
Total 1135
Henry is a back-up to Demarco Murray.
Lacy is on IR.
I get it though, I do. If the best player from my school in the NFL was getting utterly and thoroughly schooled by Julio Jones, I'd do everything in my power to shift attention to a different position.
Nah, just kidding. I wouldn't demonstrate a complete lack of knowledge of the NFL game by starting absurd threads. I'll leave that to LSU fans.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News