Started By
Message

re: How?

Posted on 10/24/16 at 12:27 pm to
Posted by surgicalvenom
Omaha
Member since Jan 2014
5380 posts
Posted on 10/24/16 at 12:27 pm to
It is because a DC will have a much more difficult time transitioning to the HC position than an OC. It takes years to perfect a defensive scheme and in college you have kids start 2-3 years and move on. You're constantly starting over so unless you're Bama, it's extremely hard to perfect your scheme. So DC's are more closed off, stubborn and resistant because they have spent their careers trying to do the impossible.

An OC can have an impact almost right away, especially with the spread variances. An OC learning curve is so much easier, especially if you recruit a good QB. There is no single recruit on defense that can have the impact of a good QB on offense. A good OC is flexible, and uses his offense to cover up deficincies in personnel, and exploit strengths. OC's attack defenses, DC's learn to respond to attacks.

Successful first time HC's overwhelmingly come from the OCs. DC's overwhelmingly struggle in their first HC job.
Posted by reedus23
St. Louis
Member since Sep 2011
25485 posts
Posted on 10/24/16 at 1:15 pm to
Like it or not, the offense is improved from last year. Sure there's still a lot to fix but they didn't put up numbers even against the shitty teams last year.

The defense is all on an arrogant coach thinking he could improve something that didn't need improving.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter