Started By
Message

re: Danny Etling vs Sean White

Posted on 10/24/16 at 8:54 am to
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
31067 posts
Posted on 10/24/16 at 8:54 am to
White feasted on powerhouse defenses La-Monroe and Arkansas St (122nd and 89th, respectively). His numbers outside those two games are sad.

Eitling boosted his numbers against...

quote:

Maybe. I'm sure it doesn't hurt that the three defenses you faced in those games were abysmal. Missouri - 109th Ole Miss - 107th Only Southern Miss is highly ranked on D, but that's smoke and mirrors - take out the 41 yards vs Savannah State (WHO?) and their ranking plummets. This team gave up 400+ yards to Kentucky and 532 yards and 55 points to UTSA - a team averaging 29 points and 391 yards per game. So, yes, LSU is improved... but they've demonstrated that against three completely horrible defenses. They've got Alabama, Florida and Texas A&M - all with above average defenses - to prove that these improvements are legit, and not just the benefit of playing horrid defenses.



So, they're both the beneficiaries of the majority of their "good" numbers coming against horrid defenses. Outside of those games, they're not good at all. Thankfully for both teams, they rely on the run game. Neither QB is winning against a good defense with their arm.
Posted by PearlJam
NotBeardEaves
Member since Aug 2014
13908 posts
Posted on 10/24/16 at 9:05 am to
Sean white complete 70+% for over 200 yards against LSU and MSU.

He was bad against Clemson, but a lot of that can be attributed to qb rotation and the situations that put him in.
This post was edited on 10/24/16 at 9:05 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter