Started By
Message

re: Hit on Kelly vs Hurts

Posted on 9/19/16 at 10:44 pm to
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 9/19/16 at 10:44 pm to
You're seriously arguing that Ruben obliterating LF is targeting, but the hit on Hurts wasn't? Because the Ole Miss player absolutely lowered his head and hit Hurts just as high.
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 9/20/16 at 12:43 am to
quote:

You're seriously arguing that Ruben obliterating LF is targeting, but the hit on Hurts wasn't? Because the Ole Miss player absolutely lowered his head and hit Hurts just as high.


More like they were all bad arse hits and fun as hell to watch.

But Foster attacked with the crown of his helmet. With the hit on Hurts the defender put his facemask under Hurts chin. A small distinction but the rule makes one hit an automatic ejection and the other legal.

Reality is that the rule is to protect the defender more so than the ball carrier.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter