Started By
Message

re: #10 A&M vs #17 Arky in Jerry's World Hype

Posted on 9/22/16 at 7:23 am to
Posted by Chill98
Member since Aug 2015
2151 posts
Posted on 9/22/16 at 7:23 am to
quote:

I think A&M will struggle if they don't figure a way to complete more than 50% of their passes and 30% of 3rd downs, which is inflated by playing a SWAC school.



Arkansas likely has the "inflated" stats. A&M has played a much tougher schedule so far this year than Arky. UCLA had the 14th and Auburn the 7th most talented roster according to 247 recruiting ratings. There are a bunch of potential NFL stars on those 2 rosters.

Arky played 31st ranked TCU and #77 Louisiana Tech. They also have an additional OT period that shows up in their offensive statistics.
Posted by lefty08
Not in Auburn or Louisiana
Member since Aug 2014
5611 posts
Posted on 9/22/16 at 7:25 am to
Recruiting rankings......
Posted by oklahogjr
Gold Membership
Member since Jan 2010
36765 posts
Posted on 9/22/16 at 7:27 am to
quote:

rkansas likely has the "inflated" stats. A&M has played a much tougher schedule so far this year than Arky. UCLA had the 14th and Auburn the 7th most talented roster according to 247 recruiting ratings. There are a bunch of potential NFL stars on those 2 rosters.

Arky played 31st ranked TCU and #77 Louisiana Tech. They also have an additional OT period that shows up in their offensive statistics.

Recruiting rankings are mostly for entertainment purposes. Certainly they don't predict the outcomes of an individual game or strength of schedule. Auburn is awful and about to fire their coach. Ucla Is at best the third best program in California.
Posted by admiralduckwad
Member since Dec 2012
2700 posts
Posted on 9/22/16 at 7:47 am to
quote:

Arkansas likely has the "inflated" stats. A&M has played a much tougher schedule so far this year than Arky. UCLA had the 14th and Auburn the 7th most talented roster according to 247 recruiting ratings. There are a bunch of potential NFL stars on those 2 rosters.


UCLA and Auburn have both "out-recruited" us in the last 5 years i'm sure, but in the last 5 years check on who has more get drafted to the NFL.

which is a better indicator? recruiting the best 18 year olds or creating the most professional athletes?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter