Nutt isn't named in the investigation. Probably should be your first clue that the NCAA view Saunders and Vaughn alone as responsible here. Those two guys WERE on Nutts staff. Semantics aside, there is no way that the NCAA view the university responsible(new pres, AD, and HC) and yet somehow not the coach who those two coached under.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by narddogg81

Vancouver

Member since Jan 2012

19724 posts

Posted on 6/30/16 at 4:24 pm to VivaZapata27

quote:
Nutt isn't named in the investigation. Probably should be your first clue that the NCAA view Saunders and Vaughn alone as responsible here. Those two guys WERE on Nutts staff. Semantics aside, there is no way that the NCAA view the university responsible(new pres, AD, and HC) and yet somehow not the coach who those two coached under.

you are going to be pretty disappointed

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by RT1941

Member since May 2007

30292 posts

Posted on 6/30/16 at 4:31 pm to VivaZapata27

quote:
Nutt isn't named in the investigation. Probably should be your first clue that the NCAA view Saunders and Vaughn alone as responsible here. Those two guys WERE on Nutts staff. Semantics aside, there is no way that the NCAA view the university responsible(new pres, AD, and HC) and yet somehow not the coach who those two coached under.

The NCAA has no jurisdiction over Houston Nutt any longer, and Houston Nutt isn't beholden to the NCAA in any capacity.

I think the NCAA already viewed the University responsible and totally overlooked Nutt as his name never appeared in the NOA.