Started By
Message

re: Better late than never...

Posted on 6/22/16 at 12:53 pm to
Posted by NanosTacoRun
Member since Jun 2015
3061 posts
Posted on 6/22/16 at 12:53 pm to
So you're saying we'd be better off if we would have gotten our brains beaten in after the move to the SEC, confirming what all our rivals were saying (that we couldn't compete in a better conference)?

And we'd be better offer if our recruiting classes had been in the 20s and 30s, even though you claim we're already screwed with classes in the teens?
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46598 posts
Posted on 6/22/16 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

So you're saying we'd be better off if we would have gotten our brains beaten in after the move to the SEC, confirming what all our rivals were saying (that we couldn't compete in a better conference)?


I'm saying four 6-6 to 8-4 type seasons with a subsequent new hire would have very possibly been better in the long run than what we have in store for us, yes.

quote:

And we'd be better offer if our recruiting classes had been in the 20s and 30s, even though you claim we're already screwed with classes in the teens?


Sumlin gets more credit for recruiting than he should.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter