Started By
Message
re: Better late than never...
Posted on 6/22/16 at 12:53 pm to Roger Klarvin
Posted on 6/22/16 at 12:53 pm to Roger Klarvin
So you're saying we'd be better off if we would have gotten our brains beaten in after the move to the SEC, confirming what all our rivals were saying (that we couldn't compete in a better conference)?
And we'd be better offer if our recruiting classes had been in the 20s and 30s, even though you claim we're already screwed with classes in the teens?
And we'd be better offer if our recruiting classes had been in the 20s and 30s, even though you claim we're already screwed with classes in the teens?
Posted on 6/22/16 at 1:07 pm to NanosTacoRun
quote:
So you're saying we'd be better off if we would have gotten our brains beaten in after the move to the SEC, confirming what all our rivals were saying (that we couldn't compete in a better conference)?
I'm saying four 6-6 to 8-4 type seasons with a subsequent new hire would have very possibly been better in the long run than what we have in store for us, yes.
quote:
And we'd be better offer if our recruiting classes had been in the 20s and 30s, even though you claim we're already screwed with classes in the teens?
Sumlin gets more credit for recruiting than he should.
Latest Texas A&M News
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News