Started By
Message

re: McCarron/Lacy vs Murray/Gurley

Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:08 pm to
Posted by randomways
North Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
12988 posts
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:08 pm to
quote:


But you chose them simply because they were part of a championship team.


That wasn't the only reason I chose them. I just assumed no-one would bother claiming they were the equivalent of Trent Dilfer, so I didn't bother stating what I considered to be obvious, i.e. that both sets of players were topnotch. If they weren't, this wouldn't be a question at all. Nobody is comparing Murray/Gurley to Vanderbilt's own McCrary/Webb here. They were comparing two Heisman-quality players to two Heisman-quality players. (The fact that one player on each side didn't actually make a serious run for the prize doesn't diminish their quality of play.) I came down on the side of the two that pushed through and won the title. That's not an insult in any way to Murray/Gurley, the two of whom I respect enormously and liked watching them play.
Posted by Porter Osborne Jr
Member since Sep 2012
40204 posts
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

I just assumed


Well you know what they say about people who assume.

quote:

I came down on the side of the two that pushed through and won the title.


It would make more sense to me if there weren't 20+ other players that made a difference as well.

Honestly, I can see McCarron and Murray being a push. But Gurley is a step better than Lacy imo.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter