Started By
Message
re: McCarron/Lacy vs Murray/Gurley
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:08 pm to Porter Osborne Jr
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:08 pm to Porter Osborne Jr
quote:
But you chose them simply because they were part of a championship team.
That wasn't the only reason I chose them. I just assumed no-one would bother claiming they were the equivalent of Trent Dilfer, so I didn't bother stating what I considered to be obvious, i.e. that both sets of players were topnotch. If they weren't, this wouldn't be a question at all. Nobody is comparing Murray/Gurley to Vanderbilt's own McCrary/Webb here. They were comparing two Heisman-quality players to two Heisman-quality players. (The fact that one player on each side didn't actually make a serious run for the prize doesn't diminish their quality of play.) I came down on the side of the two that pushed through and won the title. That's not an insult in any way to Murray/Gurley, the two of whom I respect enormously and liked watching them play.
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:14 pm to randomways
quote:
I just assumed
Well you know what they say about people who assume.
quote:
I came down on the side of the two that pushed through and won the title.
It would make more sense to me if there weren't 20+ other players that made a difference as well.
Honestly, I can see McCarron and Murray being a push. But Gurley is a step better than Lacy imo.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News