Started By
Message
re: Hugh Freeze and Ross Bjork on Finebaum
Posted on 5/31/16 at 9:55 pm to tigerinridgeland
Posted on 5/31/16 at 9:55 pm to tigerinridgeland
quote:
I am puzzled about something: The NOA lists in charge number 8 a total of 16 incidents of illegal inducements, many of which involved Harris and/or Kiffin. The amounts were generally trivial, but there was a clear pattern, which one would assume is why this was deemed as a Level I violation. I'm not sure how these are classified by Freeze as mere mistakes since even the most casual fans know that there are strict rules about providing benefits. One of the incidents occurred at Freezes's house, and on another occasion Freeze was told by (name deleted) that (name deleted)'s son was providing academic tutoring to a recruit. Was Freeze that oblivious?
That is a great post. Thanks.
1
Posted on 5/31/16 at 11:14 pm to Central Pork
That's a good point.
But I cannot figure out what Bjork is doing when he backs him so strongly in the interview. That part is a little confusing. Did I hear that Bjork was considered a candidate for other A.D. positions? UCLA?
Serious question.
But I cannot figure out what Bjork is doing when he backs him so strongly in the interview. That part is a little confusing. Did I hear that Bjork was considered a candidate for other A.D. positions? UCLA?
Serious question.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News