Started By
Message
Saunders not turned in by olé miss
Posted on 5/28/16 at 5:32 pm
Posted on 5/28/16 at 5:32 pm
LINK
quote:
Ole Miss became linked to the investigation when NCAA enforcement staff interviewed Saunders on Dec. 16, 2013 about “events that took place while that assistant was employed” elsewhere, according to the Committee on Infractions’ report, which added a football player “that institution recruited” was also part of the interview.
3
Posted on 5/28/16 at 5:35 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
“During the interviews, the enforcement staff believed the former assistant football coach may have known of or may have been involved in NCAA rules violations concerning academic issues while at another member institution,” the Committee on Infractions’ report read
Posted on 5/28/16 at 5:43 pm to Jjdoc
Nope.....Ole Miss dude who was in the admin department swears he was fired for this.........just ask him.
Posted on 5/28/16 at 5:45 pm to We_R_The_Tide
That does not add up to what the ncaa and ull state, nor does it add up with the case saunders filed against olé miss
Posted on 5/28/16 at 5:52 pm to Jjdoc
I see your logic........but I must defer to the poster who says "he knows". They are an honest bunch mind you.........
This post was edited on 5/28/16 at 5:53 pm
Posted on 5/28/16 at 6:25 pm to We_R_The_Tide
Well.. he's full of crapola.
Posted on 5/28/16 at 6:57 pm to Jjdoc
I only skimmed the Saunder's portion of the NOA and response since OM agrees to every allegation made against him and and school on the issue. But, it is all framed as OM had no clue he did that and it was totally rogue. Saunder's was getting "his guys" in and providing "his recruits" benefits. That it was self serving and done behind the head coach's and admin's back. At least that's the party line. The NCAA doesn't dispute it but it's terrible timing for OM given the other level 1 offenses. For just Saunder's they'd get maybe 1/3 of what ULL got. It makes it more likely stuff that Harris did and Kiffin did are classified higher since OM won't get the benefit of the doubt some schools have gotten when stuff was self reported and deemed not worthy of punishment (think Bama and suit gate)
I am 100% sure if the suit thing happened in 2006 and was ferreted out by the NCAA instead of through a memo from Bama it would have resulted in a NOA and another post season ban.
I am 100% sure if the suit thing happened in 2006 and was ferreted out by the NCAA instead of through a memo from Bama it would have resulted in a NOA and another post season ban.
Posted on 5/28/16 at 7:37 pm to Blawdawg
Lol... nope. Then explain another coach on the staff doing the same thing... Vaughn.
So when you look at ULL and suggest that olé miss will only get 1/3rd of what ULL got, you are not taking into account that there was another coach doing the same thing.
So when you look at ULL and suggest that olé miss will only get 1/3rd of what ULL got, you are not taking into account that there was another coach doing the same thing.
Posted on 5/28/16 at 8:26 pm to Jjdoc
Who do you think turned in Saunders? You jackass we self reported this and it got tracked down over there and that investigation was conducted prior to this one...
Way to talk out of your a-hole though..
Way to talk out of your a-hole though..
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News