Started By
Message
re: SEC Schools : Enrollment % by State (per University enrollment reports)
Posted on 4/12/16 at 3:58 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
Posted on 4/12/16 at 3:58 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
Yes, really.
Look at their enrollments as well as the money allotted from the Permanent University Fund to build facilities. In some years (many, maybe), UT Austin is not the biggest recipient of the construction bond money (they do get "excellence funds" that guarantees UT Austin the most overall PUF money).
A&M-Commerce and Kingsville and Canyon and the like would kill to have that kind of financial support.
They are just shitty schools that you likely should've never taken into the system. There's that aggie hubris again, biting you in the arse.
Look at their enrollments as well as the money allotted from the Permanent University Fund to build facilities. In some years (many, maybe), UT Austin is not the biggest recipient of the construction bond money (they do get "excellence funds" that guarantees UT Austin the most overall PUF money).
A&M-Commerce and Kingsville and Canyon and the like would kill to have that kind of financial support.
They are just shitty schools that you likely should've never taken into the system. There's that aggie hubris again, biting you in the arse.
1
Posted on 4/12/16 at 4:00 pm to texashorn
quote:
Yes, really.
Look at their enrollments as well as the money allotted from the Permanent University Fund to build facilities. In some years (many, maybe), UT Austin is not the biggest recipient of the construction bond money (they do get "excellence funds" that guarantees UT Austin the most overall PUF money).
You just blasted us for increasing enrollment, quite the double standard. And his point was that even with the increased funding those schools have not improved at all as far as academic reputation or quality of students. Please refute our argument
And IDGAF about our satellite campuses
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News