Started By
Message

re: Alabama fans - Question about the 1973 Sugar Bowl

Posted on 2/21/16 at 5:12 pm to
Posted by Hometown Hero
Member since Feb 2016
225 posts
Posted on 2/21/16 at 5:12 pm to
quote:

RollTide1987

quote:

Oh...and let's not even start on Tennessee's claim to the 1967 national championship


1925 - retroactively claimed championship
1926 - retroactively claimed championship
1930 - retroactively claimed championship
1934 - retroactively claimed championship
1941 - BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
1973 - beaten on the field by the other co-champion
1978 - beaten on the field by the other co-champion

You were saying about Tennessee?
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65147 posts
Posted on 2/21/16 at 6:21 pm to
quote:

1925 - retroactively claimed championship




quote:

1926 - retroactively claimed championship


United Press International, in the lead up to the 1927 Rose Bowl, called the game, "the football championship of America." It was also the first sporting event in American sports history to be broadcast on national radio. Alabama and Stanford played to a 7-7 tie. Naturally both can claim this as a national championship season.

quote:

1930 - retroactively claimed championship
1934 - retroactively claimed championship


Undefeated Rose Bowl seasons. I'll take them both.

quote:

1941 - BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!


Agreed.

quote:

1973 - beaten on the field by the other co-champion


See my other post above.

quote:

1978 - beaten on the field by the other co-champion


Who lost to an unranked team in the middle of the season by double digits. Alabama played the second toughest schedule in college football that season behind only Notre Dame. Our OOC opponents were Nebraska, Missouri, USC, Washington, and Virginia Tech. Nebraska, Missouri, and USC were all ranked in the Top 10 when Alabama played them. LSU was likewise ranked in the Top 10 when we played them and, to cap it all off, we played and beat #1 Penn State in the Sugar Bowl.

At the time of the Sugar Bowl, Alabama was ranked #2 in both major polls. USC just barely edged Alabama in the UPI vote but won the AP vote very handily.

Alabama was just as worthy of a national champion in 1978 as USC was.
Posted by oneusairman
somewhereville
Member since Apr 2009
568 posts
Posted on 2/21/16 at 6:32 pm to
You know we could go around in circles all day and try to explain to your simple mind how championships were awarded back then. However, your not going to accept it. Your real problem seems to be from an old system and how you perceive what should be. Everyone of those championships had awards attached to them and if you want to go back you could find fault with championships awarded with any team in general.

However, your Bama obsession is just sweet. It is really sad that Tennessee is just about as irrelevant as Vanderbilt is these days. Best of luck for the future.
This post was edited on 2/21/16 at 6:33 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter