Hometown Hero

quote:

---

This thread IS the problem. Rather than try to destroy the woman and call her crazy, why not present the facts and let it go?

She did not "break the silence" on the situation, the Mannings did when he addressed it in his book. She did not bring it all back up recently, the lawsuit did.

Why do people feel it's okay to sling all sorts of accusations against this woman? No wonder women never want to come forward - they get dragged through the mud almost every single time, whether their accusations are true or false.

---

Why do idiots like you feel it is okay for this woman to try and destroy multiple people?

People are supposed to lie down and take her slanderous accusations?

quote:

---

She also said Fulmer and Chavis were pole smokers.

---

She accused Fulmer of hitting on her.

Which is it? Are these men gay, or are they all trying to play with her big tits?

frick the Rant pukes.

LINK

You have those liberal pieces of shite at HuffPo adding fuel to fire.

LINK

Manning's accuser is now claiming he is gay.

LINK

This bitch is a certified lunatic.

quote:

---

they will tear you apart because pretty much everyone on that board hates tennessee, regardless of what the topic is.

---

frick those idiot bastards.

Rip back.

You rip into them hard and their pussies start bleeding and they lay on the RA button. :lol:

quote:

---

She has a team full of five stars, absolutely no excuse.

---

This right here! :banghead:

They need to fire her arse immediately.

quote:

---

cajunbama

---

How did you get your northalabamacracker name banned?

quote:

---

I'll bet you're a youngun.

---

I'll bet I'm not.

That is how I know a lot of your claims are BS. I remember when y'all suddenly went from claiming 7 and jumped to 12.

You claim those because of one man. :lol:

LINK

The reason your fellow fans have launched personal attacks is because I hit them in the mouth with facts. They have noting other than the ad hominem.

quote:

---

AlabamaAlum07

---

Right! Anyone that slaps your stupid arse in the mouth with facts is a troll. :rolleyes:

Once again, go pull a few more championships out of your Little Dick Syndrome suffering asses.


1925 - retroactively claimed championship
1926 - retroactively claimed championship
1930 - retroactively claimed championship
1934 - retroactively claimed championship
1941 - BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
1973 - beaten on the field by the other co-champion
1978 - beaten on the field by the other co-champion

FACTS:

1925 National Championship- Alabama claims they share this one with Dartmouth. Who awarded the NC? Houlgate and Helms. Houlgate started his system in 1927. So Bama won their 1925 NC using a formula that didn’t exist until 1927? Helms Athletic Foundation started in 1941. Another incredible retroactive NC. (no one claimed 1925, let's jump back 15 years and claim it :rotflmao:)

1926 National Championship- Alabama claims they share this one with 3 other teams with equal or better records! Once again it is the Helms Athletic Foundation in 1941 that awards it! (15 years AFTER the fact)

The Associated Press Poll has been active since 1936. The AP took their final poll prior to bowl games from 1936 – 1964 and in 1966 and 1967. They took their final poll after the bowl games in 1965 and from 1968 – Current.

1930 National Championship- The Davis poll says that Bama tied Notre Dame for NC this year. This was the only one to award it to Bama. Notre Dame was named NC in 6 polls! Parke Davis is another retroactive system! He (an individual, not an organization) did his in 1933! (one guy proclaimed you champions...hang a banner :lol:)

1934 National Championship- Alabama says they share this with two other teams. The awarders are Dunkel, Williamson, and Football Thesaurus. Dunkel was an individual who came up with his own system. Williamson was a geologist who came up with his own system. Football Thesaurus first appeared in 1946! (even better...a geologist names you champions a dozen years later...print the rings :lol:)

1941 National Championship- This is a complete joke. The AP ranked Alabama 20th in the nation with 14 teams with better records in the top 20. Once again it is the Football Thesaurus that retroactively awards it. Alabama finished 3rd in the SEC that year. Mississippi State won the SEC title..yet Bama claims a National title! (what a joke :lol:)

1973 National Championship- AP puts Bama 4th after their bowl game loss. Bama claims a NC from the UPI poll that was taken before they met Notre Dame in the bowl game and lost. There were 3 teams with better records than Bama that year. The embarrassment of naming Alabama number one caused the UPI to name champions after bowl games. Yet Bammer has no shame in claiming it of course. (beaten on the field by the real champion)

1978 National Championship- AP gives this to Alabama(11-1-0) even though USC (12-1-0) had the better record Guess who Alabama lost to that year? USC!!!!!!!!!. UPI gave the NC to USC. (beaten on the field by the real champion)

YOUR media guide. 6+5=16 :rotflmao:

quote:

---

Michigan was one of the biggest abusers of this recruiting technique. Realizing they only had one national championship season to brag about from the poll era, the Wolverine SID went back to the early years of the 20th century to wrangle in some national championships. They claimed 1901, 1902, 1903, as well as 1904. And then topped it off with 1923, 1932, 1933, and 1947.

Did anyone in the SID office care that 7 of their 9 newly minted national championships came from the pre-WWII era? No. All they cared about was the sign that hung on the banner below the school name: 10-time NCAA National Champions. That, combined with their record number of wins and Big Ten titles, made the school look good to attend for some big time athletes.

---

"Michigan did it first." :wah:

That does not excuse the fact you went back claiming retroactive championships that were not awarded in the year in question.

You have basically made up a bunch of championships. A damned geologist awards you a championship 15 years after the fact and you claim it. :rolleyes:

It would be funny if it were not so pathetic.