Started By
Message

re: Judge rules against opponents of removing Confederate memorials ...

Posted on 2/5/16 at 9:29 pm to
Posted by Kentucker
Cincinnati, KY
Member since Apr 2013
19351 posts
Posted on 2/5/16 at 9:29 pm to
quote:

You didn't answer my question. As a matter of fact you intentionally ignored the question and answered another question that was not asked.


I thought I did. What Sherman did was obscene. War is obscene.
Posted by sms151t
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
139889 posts
Posted on 2/5/16 at 9:34 pm to
Sherman is on the same level as Tojo and Von Hindenburgh to me

He burned and killed old men and boys.

While I understand his theory his application was unwarranted. The defenses he faced were much like the defense of Berlin in WW2, non existent and would've given up if given a chance.
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37973 posts
Posted on 2/5/16 at 11:08 pm to
quote:

I thought I did. What Sherman did was obscene.


So then, why do we honor him with an untouchable statue in Central Park in NYC?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter