Started By
Message

re: Comparing this class to 2001

Posted on 2/4/16 at 8:44 pm to
Posted by DawgNation4
Member since Nov 2012
1023 posts
Posted on 2/4/16 at 8:44 pm to
So contrary to popular belief Richt could develop talent...hmmm

Shocking, a coach with a 75% winning percentage could develop players. I guess Vince Dooley did know what he was doing...
Posted by fibonaccisquared
The mystical waters of the Hooch
Member since Dec 2011
16898 posts
Posted on 2/4/16 at 8:53 pm to
quote:

So contrary to popular belief Richt could develop talent...hmmm


Not sure where I stated this (or if this was even directed at me at all). Generally speaking, my point was Richt was able to grab a fair amount top tier talent but was unable to win the big games with them. I'd say that would point to an inability to obtain maximum results, which is pretty much defined by player development. No one ever said Richt did "no developing", simply that what he was doing was insufficient to win on the biggest stages. Couple that with usually at least one glaring deficiency from a player personnel standpoint and you have what amounts to an achilles heel the size of the grand canyon and a neon sign pointing it out.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter