Started By
Message
re: Best NFL teams/scenarios for Dak.
Posted on 2/12/16 at 12:12 pm to DynastyDawg
Posted on 2/12/16 at 12:12 pm to DynastyDawg
I know that. What I was trying to say was that the residual aspects of the back surgery might be longer lasting than the clavicle injury. Since we were both putting the injuries in perspective.
Sorry I didn't word that better.
Sorry I didn't word that better.
1
Posted on 2/12/16 at 1:18 pm to CowTownReb
I would agree. Back problems will almost always be a more lingering issue than a broken bone, whatever bone that may be. Thankfully, to this point, Tony hasn't missed many games because of it.
I'm probably being overly-defensive, but this is one thing that gets under my skin. Everyone likes to talk about how much Romo sucks and how injury prone he is, even though it couldn't be further from the truth.
The guy has put up fringe top 5 QB numbers in the league for the last 5-8 years. The problem in Dallas isn't Tony Romo, it has been the defense for the entire time he has been the starter there outside of the Parcell years when he was young. It just gets tiring to defend him, when he shouldn't have to be defended.
Trust me, Romo has given me my fair share of stomach ulcers watching the Cowboys play, but not giving him his due credit is wrong.
I'm probably being overly-defensive, but this is one thing that gets under my skin. Everyone likes to talk about how much Romo sucks and how injury prone he is, even though it couldn't be further from the truth.
The guy has put up fringe top 5 QB numbers in the league for the last 5-8 years. The problem in Dallas isn't Tony Romo, it has been the defense for the entire time he has been the starter there outside of the Parcell years when he was young. It just gets tiring to defend him, when he shouldn't have to be defended.
Trust me, Romo has given me my fair share of stomach ulcers watching the Cowboys play, but not giving him his due credit is wrong.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News