Started By
Message

re: Projecting where the recruiting classes finish up...

Posted on 1/29/16 at 2:02 pm to
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
59009 posts
Posted on 1/29/16 at 2:02 pm to
quote:

I wouldn't say upset, but it shouldn't even be a contest. 24/7 and every site negatively rank recruits that verbally commit well in advance or create little to no drama in their recruitment. They get more clicks, subscribers, ect from the influx of drama caused by many national recruits. You see time and again recruits that excell at events and camps get dropped for one that would lead to "a more exciting NSD."

Call it what you want, but I'll call it BS. LSU should have at least 4 or 5 5 stars ATM with a chance to add a sixth. Either way though, their star ranking won't effect their on field play.







Just so I understand correctly....

We should not pay any attention to the recruiting services that rank players for a living....but we should listen to your rankings?

I am just here for the entertainment. I could care less, but we have two schools claiming they are going to finish MUCH higher than Kyle said they would and BOTH partially based it off getting Fulton.
Posted by memphisplaya
Member since Jan 2009
85908 posts
Posted on 1/29/16 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

but we should listen to your rankings?


Ok

1. I didn't rank them
2. 24/7 dropped commits that committed early, and I'm not just talking about LSU commits. It happens every year.

It's pretty obvious they don't get as many clicks for non-drama come NSD. Analysts will even tell you that it's a messy part of the recruiting service business. Bottom line is the companies lose money, support, and interest if they don't make the rankings fluid.

Also Fulton is only one piece left for LSU.

But please keep going.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter