Started By
Message

re: How does Bama's current run compare to other dynasties in their prime?

Posted on 12/16/15 at 1:14 pm to
Posted by CBandits82
Lurker since May 2008
Member since May 2012
54292 posts
Posted on 12/16/15 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

Again, Miami's "down" years were a 5-year stretch in which they finished in the Top 20 in 4 out of the 5 seasons. I don't think that was ever bad enough to say the dynasty ended since it picked right back up in 2000 and saw another 4 consecutive years of Top 5 finishes.

During this "down" period (1995-1999), Miami was 13th nationally in weekly AP Poll appearances, so its not like they were irrelevant.

To try to liken Miami's "down" years to Bama's down years between the Stallings years and when Saban rebuilt Bama is a joke.

From 1997-2007, Bama went through an 11-year period that included just three Top 25 finishes... none of them consecutive. It also included four losing seasons.

That's far different than Miami's 5 "down" years which included four Top 20 finishes. Not even close to the same thing.






Checkmate.
Posted by CCTider
Member since Dec 2014
24257 posts
Posted on 12/16/15 at 1:18 pm to
That's a pretty good point. I'll roll with it. It was definitely an impressive run.
This post was edited on 12/16/15 at 1:19 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter