Started By
Message
re: Henry's Heisman whore-off was too obvious to the committee.
Posted on 12/7/15 at 9:30 pm to thatthang
Posted on 12/7/15 at 9:30 pm to thatthang
Oh stop. His last nine carries against LSU were not needed.
Maybe your team really isn't that good if you really believe that Auburn game absolutely needed that many late game carries from Henry. I know you don't believe that either of those two games were "in doubt".
As a matter of fact, teams that are running the ball that many times in a row have already imposed their will... Any other back on Bamas team could have closed the game out. A quick pass here and there would have worked.
You are just being dense right now.
Maybe your team really isn't that good if you really believe that Auburn game absolutely needed that many late game carries from Henry. I know you don't believe that either of those two games were "in doubt".
As a matter of fact, teams that are running the ball that many times in a row have already imposed their will... Any other back on Bamas team could have closed the game out. A quick pass here and there would have worked.
You are just being dense right now.
2
Posted on 12/7/15 at 9:31 pm to bgtiger
wait so you think he loses the Heisman because Alabama was trying so hard to get him the trophy? You are fricking dumb. Let's be honest man....you're angry as frick because he took the spotlight from your best RB of all time. He took his stats and he took his trophy and quite frankly you're very angry about it. Alabama still owns your soul.
This post was edited on 12/7/15 at 9:33 pm
Posted on 12/7/15 at 11:57 pm to bgtiger
quote:
Oh stop. His last nine carries against LSU were not needed.
Maybe you guys should have tried to stop him, then.
Your suggestions for changing a winning game plan is laughable, under the circumstances that actually happened. Is ball control and time of possession really THAT difficult to understand???
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News