Started By
Message
re: In Mark Ingram's 2009 Heisman year
Posted on 11/11/15 at 8:26 pm to secuniversity
Posted on 11/11/15 at 8:26 pm to secuniversity
So playing a good game against a great defense makes it OK to lay an egg against 3 shitty teams? I'm just trying to understand your reasoning. Seems like a double standard to me. The Heisman is over rated to me. More political than about ability.
1
Posted on 11/11/15 at 8:28 pm to SNAPPERHEAD
Of course the Heisman is a political award, it's kind of a joke, always has been and always will be.
The point is, voters will give a pass for a bad performance in a win way more quickly than they will give a pass for a bad performance in a loss.
It's not fair, but that's reality. There is a heavy bias towards giving it to a player on a winning team, not necessarily the most deserving player.
The point is, voters will give a pass for a bad performance in a win way more quickly than they will give a pass for a bad performance in a loss.
It's not fair, but that's reality. There is a heavy bias towards giving it to a player on a winning team, not necessarily the most deserving player.
This post was edited on 11/11/15 at 8:30 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News