Started By
Message
re: Bama did not earn their ranking, the other teams did.
Posted on 11/4/15 at 7:27 am to bamasgot13
Posted on 11/4/15 at 7:27 am to bamasgot13
quote:
Michigan State has a road win that is better than any win Bama has. Call it fluke if you want but they have the W Call it a fluke if you want? Whether I want to call it that or not is irrelevant. I HAVE to call it that b/c that's precisely what it was. The committee seemingly took that into account too.
MSU completely outplayed Michigan in that game. Outgained them 2-1, and Michigan was the team who got a phantom TD when they were stopped on 4th and goal at the 1 but the refs decided to run towards the scrum before blowing the whistle
The issue is that if the playoff started today, without forecasting, college football would go into anarchy with Bama included. They LOST A GAME AT HOME TO AN AVEARGE FOOTBALL TEAM. They didn't lose to a #1 LSU 9-6 in overtime. They lost to an already 2 loss team who lost to a team from the American conference convincingly.
I didn't trumpet OSU at all, because I'm not even sure they should be in the top 4 at this point. However, MSU has a better win than anything Bama has...and MSU doesn't have a loss
2
Posted on 11/4/15 at 7:29 am to Buckeye06
I like MSU but they are hot garbage. Lucky for them, the Big Ten is.
Posted on 11/4/15 at 7:32 am to Buckeye06
But the playoffs don't start today so that point is irrelevant. That isn't the issue. MSU does have a better win. No question. Overall though Alabama is 4-1 against teams in the top 30. So, is one huge win more important than 4 good wins? The committee doesn't seems to think so.
This post was edited on 11/4/15 at 7:55 am
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News