re: The Richt apologists are firmly seated on the wrong side of history

quote:

---

Georgia should always, no matter what, be better than Tennessee, Missouri, South Carolina, Kentucky, and Vanderbilt.[/quote[Well that's some homer BS if I've ever seen it. Each year is different. Each team is different. You might as well say "we should win the SEC East every year" or "we should win a national championship every year" because... well.. WE'RE GEORGIA!!

It doesn't work that way.

[quote]In year 15, Richt should not be getting his shite pushed in by a fricking rookie coach.

---

Another dumb statement, IMO, as Florida's coach is no rookie (except at Florida) and it he still inherited a dominant defense and offensive line. Remember that we got killed by Muschamp last year who got canned for being bad.

quote:

---

There are so, so, so many built in advantages to being the head football coach at Georgia that there are no excuses, ever, to lose 38-10 at home or 27-3 (and counting) on a neutral site. Will a Richt defender please tell me why he should stay without using the word Eason?

---

This goes back to my previous point that we don't win games just because we're UGA, and no coach will win games here just because you think he "should".

I'm as big of a UGA fan as anyone but I swear that this fanbase is terrible when it comes to what we "deserve". We haven't won a national championship in 35 years yet everyone expects us to win it every year just because we are UGA and we have all these advantages. Other than physical proximity to in-state talent, what advantages do we have that most other SECs don't?