Started By
Message

re: Was the targeting call against RSJ (TAMU) the correct call?

Posted on 10/5/15 at 8:23 pm to
Posted by Agforlife
Somewhere in the Brazos Valley
Member since Nov 2012
20102 posts
Posted on 10/5/15 at 8:23 pm to
quote:

rsj didn't have to move.



So what now players are just supposed to stop and not play, he didn't lower his head and launch, he made a blindside block, albeit a vicious one, but it was just a blindside block.
Posted by bfniii
Member since Nov 2005
17840 posts
Posted on 10/5/15 at 8:29 pm to
quote:

players are just supposed to stop and not play
1. that's not what i said.
2. according to the rule, he didn't have to "target" the defenseless player. had he stood still, there's no way he gets flagged and you know it.
3. standing still doesn't equate to uselessness.

quote:

he didn't lower his head and launch
actually the replay shows he did.

1. he ran towards the player
2. he lowered his helmet. the helmets made contact first.
3. he definitely launched into the defender.

quote:

he made a blindside block, albeit a vicious one, but it was just a blindside block.
according to the prior iteration of the rule, you would be correct. i don't necessarily agree with the new rule but, i do understand the reason and don't like seeing players get hurt.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter