Started By
Message

re: Alabama: 5 yards per play/Ole Miss 6.7 yards per play

Posted on 9/24/15 at 11:27 pm to
Posted by SECRantLurker
Dallas, TX
Member since Sep 2013
148 posts
Posted on 9/24/15 at 11:27 pm to
quote:

I never made that argument. You are typing an awful lot to make pretty simple points. How far past the Los was any OM linemen when Kelly let go of the football? More than 3? Less than three? That's all that matters. You keep bringing up these strawman arguments that I haven't made in this thread or on this website since the game ended. They mean literally nothing.


Saban made the argument, which is the general argument for the arbitrary "3 yards" rule anyway. It proved to not even matter on this play.

It looks like you're trying to be the guy that takes the black and white stance that a penalty ended up occurring even though it had no effect on the play, so the play shouldn't be allowed to stand. Written in another way, you're the guy that replays every play and points out holding and puts the ending score to every game ever played in your Notebook of College Football History as 0-0 since holding happens on every play.

That's a lame way to approach the game.
This post was edited on 9/24/15 at 11:35 pm
Posted by Patton
Principality of Sealand
Member since Apr 2011
32652 posts
Posted on 9/24/15 at 11:40 pm to
quote:

Saban made the argument, which is the general argument for the arbitrary "3 yards" rule anyway. It proved to not even matter on this play.

It looks like you're trying to be the guy that takes the black and white stance that a penalty ended up occurring even though it had no effect on the play, so the play shouldn't be allowed to stand. Written in another way, you're the guy that replays every play and points out holding and puts the ending score to every game ever played in your Notebook of College Football History as 0-0 since holding happens on every play.

That's a lame way to approach the game.





The fact of the matter is, a penalty could have been thrown on the play which would have negated the TD. The call may have changed be course of the game. You have been adamant so far the linemen's positioning was inconsequential to the play because their position had no effect on the outcome. Wrong. Their positioning is the only thing that matters to what I'm talking about. You have also been adamant that the CBs reading of the play negated any kind of penalty. Wrong. The cornerbacks positions doesn't have anything to do with ineligible receiver downfield. The fact of the matter is nearly everything you have posted towards me has been wrong, strawman bullshite. Stop bringing up Saban. He has nothing to do with this. Now you are saying that it's a lame way to look at the game. That's cool. You made a pretty hilarious jab about notebooks and 0-0 ties. Good shite. You were shown to be wrong here. Your OP is a troll. You should stick to lurking.
This post was edited on 9/24/15 at 11:43 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter