re: 2004 Alabama vs. Auburn Highlights

quote:

---

They were good but USC was great. And Auburn wasn't going to beat them. There's no amount of arguing that can change what happened anyway so I don't know why Auburn fans are so salty about it still From 2002-2004, USC was like 34-3 with two natties and the 2004 is consistently regarded as one of the better college football teams in recent history. Frequently rated in the top three within the past 25 years.

All I'm saying is that it's time to move on. If Auburn wanted to edge out Oklahoma then they shouldn't have laid a goose egg the year before against USC on their home turf. Nobody had any faith that Auburn was going to beat USC if they made it to the game

---

That's the problem. Auburn would have won, they were the more talented team top to bottom. Unfortunately as so often happens the better team wasn't given a chance to prove it. Thankful for the 4 team playoff. What would have happened to poor OSU last year who couldn't have beaten bama or oregon until they played the games and everyone realized they were better.