Started By
Message

re: Florida wouldn't take Ukwuachu Transfer

Posted on 8/25/15 at 5:25 pm to
Posted by ChiTownBammer
South Florida
Member since Aug 2014
1129 posts
Posted on 8/25/15 at 5:25 pm to
Why does Boise not bear any responsibility for shopping this POS around if they knew he was so bad? What was Baylor supposed to know that Boise didn't?
Posted by SpanishFortTiger
Spanish Fort, Alabama
Member since Dec 2014
1662 posts
Posted on 8/25/15 at 5:26 pm to
In actual convictions, Zach Mettenburger was a riskier transfer than Ukwuachu.
Posted by oman
Dallas
Member since Sep 2014
3280 posts
Posted on 8/25/15 at 5:29 pm to
quote:

Why does Boise not bear any responsibility for shopping this POS around if they knew he was so bad? What was Baylor supposed to know that Boise didn't?


I agree to an extent. Don't know at this point what Boise told anyone. Maybe they could have done more.

It certainly appears that Baylor could have done a whole lot more, just in terms of questions asked and other due diligence.
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25265 posts
Posted on 8/25/15 at 5:32 pm to
quote:

Why does Boise not bear any responsibility for shopping this POS around if they knew he was so bad? What was Baylor supposed to know that Boise didn't?


It is hard enough to pin this on Briles, imagine what SI would have to do to get people mobilized against a coach and school that dismissed the kid, especially now that the coach is at a new school. Low hanging fruit is Briles. He's the target of this.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter