Started By
Message
re: Serious Question: Why no respect for the two-time SEC East-winning Yankee Ruffians
Posted on 8/5/15 at 1:43 pm to Wtodd
Posted on 8/5/15 at 1:43 pm to Wtodd
Injuries only matter for Georgia.
Never mind we had our entire 2 deep on the OL miss multiple games AND lost out QB for the majority of the season. I mean, they had a couple WR/RB out. No way to overcome something like that. Of course we can't mention that one of their thugs hit Franklin well after the whistle and put him out of the game. Shhh...
Never mind we had our entire 2 deep on the OL miss multiple games AND lost out QB for the majority of the season. I mean, they had a couple WR/RB out. No way to overcome something like that. Of course we can't mention that one of their thugs hit Franklin well after the whistle and put him out of the game. Shhh...
4
Posted on 8/5/15 at 2:03 pm to JesusQuintana
Let's see your list of starting OL and their missed 2013 starts. Just to make sure you aren't exaggerating things.
Posted on 8/5/15 at 2:14 pm to JesusQuintana
All BS aside- my honest (not snarky response to ridiculous comments (imo)from Mizzou folks) assessment of Mizzou football:
When Mizzou came in, most thought (and I would include most Mizzou fans) that they wouldn't fare well in the SEC. That was proven false.
Mizzou has very good coaching, obviously they have incredible scouting and really develop talent well. They play above their weight on a consistent basis. Something UGA does not do.
Was their timing good with UF and UT being down- absolutely. Was their schedule favorable avoiding Bama, AU and LSU- sure.
But the bottom line is you have to win the East to win the SEC. No matter how favorable the schedule may be you simply can't win a division in the SEC if you suck. Mizzou had 3 "must win" games vs. pretty good teams and won them all. UGA didn't.
Mizzou has proven to be a solid, stable, above average program. But UF and UT will rival UGA in the talent dept soon. And the big guns from the West will cycle through. I honestly don't think Mizzou will compete if they themselves don't improve vs. elite programs. I think the last two years support that argument.
I really wish they would get their heads out of their arse and help us in basketball....
When Mizzou came in, most thought (and I would include most Mizzou fans) that they wouldn't fare well in the SEC. That was proven false.
Mizzou has very good coaching, obviously they have incredible scouting and really develop talent well. They play above their weight on a consistent basis. Something UGA does not do.
Was their timing good with UF and UT being down- absolutely. Was their schedule favorable avoiding Bama, AU and LSU- sure.
But the bottom line is you have to win the East to win the SEC. No matter how favorable the schedule may be you simply can't win a division in the SEC if you suck. Mizzou had 3 "must win" games vs. pretty good teams and won them all. UGA didn't.
Mizzou has proven to be a solid, stable, above average program. But UF and UT will rival UGA in the talent dept soon. And the big guns from the West will cycle through. I honestly don't think Mizzou will compete if they themselves don't improve vs. elite programs. I think the last two years support that argument.
I really wish they would get their heads out of their arse and help us in basketball....
Posted on 8/5/15 at 3:33 pm to JesusQuintana
quote:
I mean, they had a couple WR/RB out.
It was 5 of our 6 best playmakers.
1st and 2nd string rb's and our 3 best wide receivers.
But yea, it was just a couple wr/rb...
Posted on 8/5/15 at 4:53 pm to JesusQuintana
quote:
r the majority of the season. I mean, they had a couple WR/RB out. No way to overcome something like that.
What a gross misrepresentation of The situation. Yea, it was only a guy named todd gurley, his speedster backup, and the other side of an explosive passing game.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News