Started By
Message

re: The History of Political Correctness, Cultural Marxism, Critical Theory

Posted on 7/10/15 at 10:37 am to
Posted by Stonehog
Platinum Rewards Club
Member since Aug 2011
33417 posts
Posted on 7/10/15 at 10:37 am to
quote:

Please research all the points and attempt to refute them. Please


He says Rodney King was so famous because his story upheld the narrative. No mention at all that the Rodney King verdict started a huge riot in which dozens of people were killed, thousands injured, with over $1 billion in damages. That's why that story was international news.

He says the quote from the African king makes slavery more about economics and not about racism. Slavery was always about economics.

He says about the Left, "Everything they believe in has proven to be wrong." Really Bill? Everything? Mmkay.

Says the American Civil War was fought because the Union wanted to wipe out the memory of slavery. This is patently false. Lincoln didn't change the Union cause to the eradication of slavery until 1863.

Says the faceless guy with the gun is never named because the media didn't feel the need to identify him. In the next breath he says that guy should sue MSNBC for defamation of character. That part was just dumb.

For all the raving he does about Rachel Maddow and MSNBC, Bill is also a caricature of a radical just like Maddow.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111720 posts
Posted on 7/10/15 at 10:46 am to
Rodney King was famous for a confluence of events. He was famous long before the unjust verdict came out.

He was trumpeted by the media as far more than a person whose rights were abused by police. He was a symbol of racist oppression by the power structures in our country. Again, when you leftists want to rewrite history, stick to eras where the people you're arguing with weren't alive.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111720 posts
Posted on 7/10/15 at 10:47 am to
quote:

Says the faceless guy with the gun is never named because the media didn't feel the need to identify him. In the next breath he says that guy should sue MSNBC for defamation of character. That part was just dumb.


That part was dumb. But not as dumb as showing a picture of his gun and cutting away to a discussion of the racist Tea Party.
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 7/10/15 at 10:50 am to
quote:

He says Rodney King was so famous because his story upheld the narrative. No mention at all that the Rodney King verdict started a huge riot in which dozens of people were killed, thousands injured, with over $1 billion in damages. That's why that story was international news.
You're confused. How did the riots start if it wasn't made big news?
quote:

He says the quote from the African king makes slavery more about economics and not about racism. Slavery was always about economics.
And yet we have mounds of curricula that focus on it being about racism
quote:

He says about the Left, "Everything they believe in has proven to be wrong." Really Bill? Everything? Mmkay.
Actually he was referring to the Leftists in the academic field of critical theory
quote:

Says the American Civil War was fought because the Union wanted to wipe out the memory of slavery. This is patently false. Lincoln didn't change the Union cause to the eradication of slavery until 1863.

He didn't say that. And he was presenting it as a the type of basic facts that are ignored in order to push a victimization narrative, along with America electing a black president.
quote:

Says the faceless guy with the gun is never named because the media didn't feel the need to identify him. In the next breath he says that guy should sue MSNBC for defamation of character. That part was just dumb
The man was misrepresented as a white redneck racist when he was in fact a black peaceful political protester. Why does it matter whether they mention his name?
quote:

For all the raving he does about Rachel Maddow and MSNBC, Bill is also a caricature of a radical just like Maddow
You have nothing.


Would you like to research his historical points on the origins of critical theory in academia, the Frankfurt School, and its communist subversive origins? Anything to say at all about that?
This post was edited on 7/10/15 at 10:53 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter