Started By
Message
re: Does Chavis need a ball control offense, with elite Time of Possession?
Posted on 7/8/15 at 3:30 pm to therick711
Posted on 7/8/15 at 3:30 pm to therick711
Yeah yeah 3rd and Chavis.
- Floridatiger420
Although Florida tiger was right Chavis had more talent, he failed to factor in the competitions talent.
-RB10
LSU's average recruit is about 3.1 puts higher than the average SEC recruit
Clemson's during Steele was about 3.6 points higher.
I'd be willing to even call that a wash, since they're only marginally different.
quote:
3rd Down %: Steele 39.487 Chavis 35.27
- Floridatiger420
Although Florida tiger was right Chavis had more talent, he failed to factor in the competitions talent.
quote:
The talent on Clemson's roster was marginally better, in comparison to the rest of the ACC, than LSU's is in comparison to the SEC.
-RB10
LSU's average recruit is about 3.1 puts higher than the average SEC recruit
Clemson's during Steele was about 3.6 points higher.
I'd be willing to even call that a wash, since they're only marginally different.
This post was edited on 7/8/15 at 3:37 pm
Posted on 7/8/15 at 3:35 pm to Nguyening
I shouldn't be surprised that this would come back to Steele. This whole defelection relies solely on your belief that I think Steele is some great tactician or field general. I don't. Neither do you. So if the best thing you can say about Chavis is you think he'll be better than Steele, that's damning with feint praise if I ever saw it.
This post was edited on 7/8/15 at 3:37 pm
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)