Started By
Message

re: The New Big 6

Posted on 7/7/15 at 5:28 pm to
Posted by Latarian
Thug POS
Member since Jul 2010
27606 posts
Posted on 7/7/15 at 5:28 pm to
the first month of a year seems like a good time frame starting point to me
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25255 posts
Posted on 7/7/15 at 5:30 pm to
quote:

the first month of a year seems like a good time frame starting point to me


I don't even really care, I'm just wondering why start it in 2014? Numbers too small if you do it in 2015? Why a little over a year and not exactly a year? I think the time period is a bit arbitrary from that perspective. Who really cares, though, outside of OTL?
Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
70618 posts
Posted on 7/7/15 at 5:56 pm to
quote:

the first month of a year seems like a good time frame starting point to me


But why the first month of last year? Why is that arbitrary timeframe more significant that Jan '13, or Jan '11?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter