Started By
Message

re: 2003 USC vs 2012 Bama

Posted on 7/2/15 at 3:58 pm to
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57002 posts
Posted on 7/2/15 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

Nope. '04 Auburn doesn't have the national title next to their name. Sucks they didn't get the chance, I would have liked to see the matchup.

In order to be in the "greatest" discussion

1. Undefeated
2. National Title

'04 Auburn falls to the same level as '12 Ohio State.



Your logic is highly flawed. USC '04 simply was not that great, but keep those goal post on the move
Posted by 5thTiger
Member since Nov 2014
7996 posts
Posted on 7/2/15 at 4:00 pm to
quote:

Your logic is highly flawed. USC '04 simply was not that great, but keep those goal post on the move


How so? Requiring a national title AND undefeated season to be in the greatest discussion is flawed logic?

'04 Auburn didn't get to play for the national title therefore, are out of the "greatest" conversation. Sorry, that is just the way it is for me. Same with 2012 Ohio State.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter