Started By
Message
re: Judge denies Chavis’ request to stay school’s suit against him in Louisiana
Posted on 6/29/15 at 2:58 pm to Warrior Poet
Posted on 6/29/15 at 2:58 pm to Warrior Poet
Absolutely, I just can't see how this isn't a smoking gun. He was out doing what is in a typical coach's job description with other aTm coaches in a recruit's home that was posted during his 30 day notice. The emails would just bolster the case if you ask me. Thanks for the answer man. 
2
Posted on 6/29/15 at 6:23 pm to BLyonsTiger
quote:
Absolutely, I just can't see how this isn't a smoking gun
A smoking gun is a pay stub from A&M with Chavis's name on it dated in January. Anything short of that is why the courts are involved.
I can't WAIT until LSU is forced to settle for less because a judge is going to take one look at those pictures and laugh them out the courtroom. That is not evidence he is an employee in any legal definition.
Maybe practically what did violated the buyout, and practically what he did was a NCAA violation. The reality will be a settlement and absolutely no action from the NCAA.
Why?
Because this isn't being settled on the Rant. Hell its not even being settled in front of some king that would care about the practical reality. This is decided in a court with very hard and strange rules. It's the perfect stage for an Aggie victory.
Posted on 8/22/15 at 9:19 am to BLyonsTiger
quote:
He was out doing what is in a typical coach's job description with other aTm coaches in a recruit's home, when no one else is allowed to do so off campus during a recruiting period, that was posted during his 30 day notice. The emails would just bolster the case if you ask me.
FIFY. That would make him have to state in what capacity was he doing so. That could be the double-edged sword. Which one would hurt less?
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News