Started By
Message

re: Would Bama have won as much or more with Manziel at QB instead of McCarron?

Posted on 6/19/15 at 7:57 pm to
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
22874 posts
Posted on 6/19/15 at 7:57 pm to
No, Manziel was over-rated and only won the heisman due to them leaving him in long enough to get 5 and 6 TD's against crap teams like Rice "because he needed experience" combined with the hype of the Alabama game.

He wasn't very good when he faced most of the better defenses. And really, he wasn't that great against Alabama outside the 1 quarter.
This post was edited on 6/19/15 at 7:58 pm
Posted by Shingo
Louisiana, USA
Member since Sep 2010
3885 posts
Posted on 6/19/15 at 9:20 pm to
I honestly think you believe that. Your football iq is very low. Those Heisman voters don't know crap compared to you. I love when people say all he did was throw jump balls to Evans. Makes me smile and thank The Lord I'm not as simpleminded as some
Posted by G2160
houston
Member since May 2013
1763 posts
Posted on 6/20/15 at 12:22 am to
quote:

No, Manziel was over-rated and only won the heisman due to them leaving him in long enough to get 5 and 6 TD's against crap teams like Rice "because he needed experience" combined with the hype of the Alabama game.

He wasn't very good when he faced most of the better defenses. And really, he wasn't that great against Alabama outside the 1 quarter.


Manziel sat out 5 complete quarters, and played 1 drive (or less) in 5 other quarters in 2012. He still broke the SEC single season yardage record by nearly 800 yards despite playing in one less game than cam newton. I'm not saying he is or isnt a better Qb than Newton, only that everything you wrote is bullshite.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter