Started By
Message
re: What's Worse (in regards to Missouri's move to the SEC)?
Posted on 3/6/15 at 10:56 am to cardboardboxer
Posted on 3/6/15 at 10:56 am to cardboardboxer
quote:
The Rams owner seems hell bent on taking that one Super Bowl win with him to LA despite the city doing everything they can to stop him.
that Rams owner is first and foremost a businessman that wants to put the team where it can make the most money. The city has hardly done "everything they can" to dissuade him from moving though, they've only recently given in some concessions on a stadium bond.
If the Rams are to stay in Mo, really their best bet would be to pull a page out of the Barves playbook and relocate to a perimeter county. That would be the best way to improve the fan experience, which should not be about trying to help dowtown STL make money.
Either way the kronk has made it clear he is all about dat dollah, and no real friend to the people of Mo. Which is something a lot of us already knew.
This post was edited on 3/6/15 at 10:59 am
1
Posted on 3/6/15 at 3:29 pm to Jagd Tiger
quote:
If the Rams are to stay in Mo, really their best bet would be to pull a page out of the Barves playbook and relocate to a perimeter county. That would be the best way to improve the fan experience, which should not be about trying to help dowtown STL make money.
So you DON'T like the stadium proposal?
Honestly it is a little crazy how competitive cities are for NFL teams. Without FEMA money I don't know how broke arse Louisiana could have gotten the Superbowl to a nice enough place to keep the Saints.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News