Started By
Message

re: Are we really underachieving vs. the rest of the SEC?

Posted on 2/8/15 at 11:13 am to
Posted by davesdawgs
Georgia - Class of '75
Member since Oct 2008
20307 posts
Posted on 2/8/15 at 11:13 am to
quote:

Sure, it is a part... It is not in the top 3 for most elite recruits. Early playing time, path to NFL, relationship with coach recruiting them, and randomn intangibles would be ahead of recent past MNCs.


Don't doubt this statement but let me put it this way: If Georgia had won 3 NC's under Richt like Bama has with Saban at the helm, I am confident that we would be recruiting at a higher level.

And regarding your post about money spent on recruiting by our rivals, no doubt it's a significant factor. It is among those intangibles we have discussed often relative to the unwillingness of our admins to spend money in the football arms race. Thankfully they seem to have read the handwriting on the wall and are starting to spend more on coaches' salaries, assistants, etc. I'm actually pretty optimistic about our football program right now.
Posted by Peter Buck
Member since Sep 2012
12420 posts
Posted on 2/8/15 at 12:05 pm to
There can be a push and pull in all of this, but I do not recall many MNC winners who were also not one of the most talented teams in the NCAA by player.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter