Started By
Message

re: Are we really underachieving vs. the rest of the SEC?

Posted on 2/7/15 at 9:30 am to
Posted by Peter Buck
Member since Sep 2012
12420 posts
Posted on 2/7/15 at 9:30 am to
quote:

Yea, so clearly 3 NC's are not a factor in their ongoing recruiting dominance since then.


Given that he dominated before he won it, it appears my proof source is stronger than yours...
Posted by davesdawgs
Georgia - Class of '75
Member since Oct 2008
20307 posts
Posted on 2/7/15 at 9:41 am to
quote:

quote:
Yea, so clearly 3 NC's are not a factor in their ongoing recruiting dominance since then.


Given that he dominated before he won it, it appears my proof source is stronger than yours...


I hope you actually don't believe that and I doubt that you do. And please note I have stated repeatedly that winning NC's is just one factor in a recruits decision making process while you seem to contend that it's not a factor at all. You site ONE instance where a team, Alabama, has had a top recruiting class having not one a NC and think you have established a winning correlation. You have not. You should also consider that Saban had previously won a NC at LSU which was likely was a factor in him attracting top recruits to Alabama prior to winning his first NC at Alabama.
This post was edited on 2/7/15 at 9:59 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter