Started By
Message

re: Can we agree to the following method for National Champions? The SECR Method

Posted on 2/1/15 at 4:29 pm to
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54996 posts
Posted on 2/1/15 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

pre-1936 : none


Not sure it should be none as the SEC had good teams but did not get respect at the time.

quote:

1936 - 1997 : AP Title


The problem years would be when the polls declared the winners before the bowl games were actually played.

Posted by TheDude321
Member since Sep 2005
3167 posts
Posted on 2/1/15 at 7:55 pm to
quote:

The problem years would be when the polls declared the winners before the bowl games were actually played.


A problem with this is that early bowl games were usually described as "exhibition" games and weren't even tabulated with a team's won/loss records in most publications of that era. By the 1950s and '60s, pretty much everyone began counting it as a "real" game (and earlier bowl games have been retroactively counted as "real" games as well). Heck, the NCAA itself didn't even start combining stats from bowl games with the regular season stats until 2002.
This post was edited on 2/1/15 at 8:16 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter