quote:
Posted by Draconian Sanctions on 1/16 at 2:03 pm to Spaceball 1 quote: But I'd still argue that we can expect more improvement from our defense than you will from your offense. Well that's about as homertastic as it gets. A&M will never have a great D with that offense and believe it or not Chavis is not a miracle worker. Sure they won't be *as* bad but expecting your defense to be what he did at LSU is delusional and shows that you don't really understand football. This post was edited on 1/16 at 2:04 pm Reply • Options • Back to Top • Refresh

I said in my first post I think an avg defense is good enough to get us in with our offense. I don't expect his results while at LSU but I do expect a top 50 D.

And Clemson had the number 1 Defense, so it's wrong to assume our offense dictates a bad D.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by RB10

Member since Nov 2010

44024 posts

Posted on 1/16/15 at 2:53 pm to Spaceball 1

quote:
And Clemson had the number 1 Defense, so it's wrong to assume our offense dictates a bad D

Clemson was 34th in TOP (31:23)

aTm was 125th (26:14)

ETA: Clemson was also 54th in scoring and 61st in total offense. So, they weren't driving up and down the field, or scoring a bunch of points on quick strikes, yet they were possessing the ball for over 1/2 of the game. I think it's time to put the "Clemson is a HUNH offense" argument to rest.

This post was edited on 1/16/15 at 3:04 pm

0 ...

Report Post

SEC Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board