re: Any certain recruit(s) that you think your school played dirty in order to sign?

Are you making a distinction between "school" and "booster"? Because, despite the numerous flame thread to the contrary over the years, it's entirely possible that a booster could play dirty without the school ever suspecting any such thing took place. Sometimes there's the old wink-wink-nod-nod, but sometimes there isn't. Doesn't make the recruit himself less dirty, but it does mean the school is essentially the victim.