Started By
Message

re: The Offense, NOT CHAVIS, Cost LSU Most of Those Close Games!

Posted on 12/30/14 at 7:32 pm to
Posted by ipodking
#StopTalkingAboutWomensSports
Member since Jun 2008
56328 posts
Posted on 12/30/14 at 7:32 pm to
Lol no. In those games the opponent had the ball and needed to drive the field to win and did, a lot of times with ease.
Posted by CrimsonFever
Gump Hard or Go Home
Member since Jul 2012
17957 posts
Posted on 12/30/14 at 7:36 pm to
quote:

Lol no. In those games the opponent had the ball and needed to drive the field to win and did, a lot of times with ease.


but with LSU's underpreforming offense, these games wouldn't have been close at the end of the game if LSU's D hadn't been paying well up to that point.

I don't see what's so hard for some LSU fans to grasp about this...
Posted by tiger perry
Member since Dec 2009
25668 posts
Posted on 12/30/14 at 7:52 pm to
I hate dumb LSU sunshine retards
Posted by KG5989
Das Boot
Member since Oct 2010
16324 posts
Posted on 12/30/14 at 8:09 pm to
And how many of those times did we have the ball with very little time left on the clock and failed to pick up a 1st down to seal the W and keep the D off the field?

It's embarassing when opponents fans realize how important Chavis is to our success, while some of our fans actually want him gone. What a joke.

And OP... Good post
This post was edited on 12/30/14 at 8:12 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter