It's ... with an apostrophe.

Oh, and then in other words ... it's faith based.

Or either Christianity is a hypothesis based on the best available evidence and observations ... observations btw, which are well-documented.

Which do we have more proof of - the existence of God or the event commonly referred to as "The Big Bang?"

Which makes more sense?

A supreme being or entity - all-knowing, all-seeing, all-encompassing comprised of all the universal knowledge collected over the ions and more energy than any human could fathom, or ...

A teeny tiny ball of matter smaller than a Higgs Boson particle that all of the sudden goes BANG and converts all of its incredibly compact mass into energy which, in essence, cancels-itself-out until only the positive matter remains, all the antimatter expelled to another dimension or whatever, but with enough positive matter remaining that our universe, and everything in it, is eventually formed as the matter cools and congeals and, well, whew, anyways ...

Me personally, I like the whole idea of a Matrix being in control best .... but I have faith that there is God.

So the real question for most is, whose god wins or what form does our God take?

And there there is the question about afterlife, heaven and hell, etc.

These are the questions, fwiw, where I believe there lies a great deal of disagreement between most religions, and science.

This post was edited on 1/2/15 at 4:20 pm