Started By
Message
re: With 14 teams, the Big 6 should admit a 7th
Posted on 12/11/14 at 5:19 pm to GumBro Jackson
Posted on 12/11/14 at 5:19 pm to GumBro Jackson
quote:
I think the idea of the Big Six originated in late 80's or early 90's b/c at that time there were only six programs that had recently won SEC championships in football. As others have mentioned, last non Big Six SEC champs were Kentucky in 1976 (co-champs) and Ole Miss in 1963.
Interestingly enough 25 years later it is the exact same 6 teams that have won the SECCG (all multiple times).
The SECCG has become something of a line of demarcation (esp since it coincided w/ the first expansion), so some people prob consider Big Six to mean exclusively things that occurred in SECCG era.
I think if another team wins the SECCG the majority of people on this board would start using some kind of designator, but not assign full "Big" status. For example Big Six + 1. If that teams wins multiple SECCGs or NCs, then they would get full admission.
It would be interesting to see if the majority of people tried to kick another school out, or just expand it to Big Seven.
I've always heard it was simply schools that have won the SECCG and don't remember ever hearing anything about a "Big 6" until after Georgia, LSU and Auburn won it after the millennium.
Florida didn't win it's first SEC title until 1991, so it seems rather peculiar that they would have been a "Big 6" member before they'd ever won a SEC title. Not to mention that all the accomplishments of newer members during this time don't count if it didn't happen as a SEC member.
Moving the bar is just getting silly and making the idea of a "Big 6" laughable.
Posted on 12/11/14 at 5:23 pm to redeye
quote:
Florida didn't win it's first SEC title until 1991
We won the SEC in '84...and vacated it in 85
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News