Started By
Message

re: With 14 teams, the Big 6 should admit a 7th

Posted on 12/11/14 at 9:39 am to
Posted by GumBro Jackson
Raleigh
Member since Mar 2011
3115 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 9:39 am to
I think the idea of the Big Six originated in late 80's or early 90's b/c at that time there were only six programs that had recently won SEC championships in football. As others have mentioned, last non Big Six SEC champs were Kentucky in 1976 (co-champs) and Ole Miss in 1963.

Interestingly enough 25 years later it is the exact same 6 teams that have won the SECCG (all multiple times).

The SECCG has become something of a line of demarcation (esp since it coincided w/ the first expansion), so some people prob consider Big Six to mean exclusively things that occurred in SECCG era.

I think if another team wins the SECCG the majority of people on this board would start using some kind of designator, but not assign full "Big" status. For example Big Six + 1. If that teams wins multiple SECCGs or NCs, then they would get full admission.

It would be interesting to see if the majority of people tried to kick another school out, or just expand it to Big Seven.
Posted by Tigerjackswartz
Member since Mar 2012
322 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 9:56 am to
quote:

I think if another team wins the SECCG the majority of people on this board would start using some kind of designator, but not assign full "Big" status. For example Big Six + 1. If that teams wins multiple SECCGs or NCs, then they would get full admission


I see what you are saying. So when a team finally busts through and wins an SECCG (most likely candidate being Mizzou, since they are the only non-Big 6 team making the game lately), they will go into a new category - kind of like a limbo or purgatory - where they aren't admitted to Big 6 heaven, but have transcended from the Little 8 Hell.

I like it. We have a plan.
Posted by redeye
Member since Aug 2013
8606 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 5:19 pm to
quote:

I think the idea of the Big Six originated in late 80's or early 90's b/c at that time there were only six programs that had recently won SEC championships in football. As others have mentioned, last non Big Six SEC champs were Kentucky in 1976 (co-champs) and Ole Miss in 1963.

Interestingly enough 25 years later it is the exact same 6 teams that have won the SECCG (all multiple times).

The SECCG has become something of a line of demarcation (esp since it coincided w/ the first expansion), so some people prob consider Big Six to mean exclusively things that occurred in SECCG era.

I think if another team wins the SECCG the majority of people on this board would start using some kind of designator, but not assign full "Big" status. For example Big Six + 1. If that teams wins multiple SECCGs or NCs, then they would get full admission.

It would be interesting to see if the majority of people tried to kick another school out, or just expand it to Big Seven.


I've always heard it was simply schools that have won the SECCG and don't remember ever hearing anything about a "Big 6" until after Georgia, LSU and Auburn won it after the millennium.

Florida didn't win it's first SEC title until 1991, so it seems rather peculiar that they would have been a "Big 6" member before they'd ever won a SEC title. Not to mention that all the accomplishments of newer members during this time don't count if it didn't happen as a SEC member.

Moving the bar is just getting silly and making the idea of a "Big 6" laughable.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter