Started By
Message
re: No B12 in playoffs
Posted on 12/8/14 at 9:33 am to reedus23
Posted on 12/8/14 at 9:33 am to reedus23
They should not have been leap frogged by tOSU. Baylor or TCU. All that amounts to is a committee taking care of a blue blood program. I still look at the B10 being on the same level as the B12 competition wise. tOSU should not have made it past TCU or Baylor.
I remember when all this playoff talk started. At first, it was to include conference champions playing each other and runner ups playing each other. Somewhere along the way, someone decided they better pick teams to protect the pinnacle programs. It should have stayed with letting conference champs play for a national title. No CCG, no shot at playoffs.
I remember when all this playoff talk started. At first, it was to include conference champions playing each other and runner ups playing each other. Somewhere along the way, someone decided they better pick teams to protect the pinnacle programs. It should have stayed with letting conference champs play for a national title. No CCG, no shot at playoffs.
1
Posted on 12/8/14 at 11:23 am to jafo
I guess it comes down to who will they add? They realize now that they are going to have to make additions. Or you would think they are figuring it out. I don't expect the other conferences to give them a waiver on playing a CG without the 6 teams divisions. It would be of no benefit for the other conferences to grant such a request.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News