Started By
Message

re: We don't need 8 teams in the playoff, we need four balanced conferences

Posted on 12/7/14 at 10:17 am to
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 12/7/14 at 10:17 am to
Dude, that shite made no sense.

Anyone arguing for wild-cards, should be arguing that State should have played Bama last night for the conference championship instead of Mizzou.
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
26999 posts
Posted on 12/7/14 at 10:21 am to
quote:

Anyone arguing for wild-cards, should be arguing that State should have played Bama last night for the conference championship instead of Mizzo



No...they're arguing that State should be in the playoffs even though they weren't playing last night.

Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
20573 posts
Posted on 12/7/14 at 11:21 am to
quote:

Anyone arguing for wild-cards, should be arguing that State should have played Bama last night for the conference championship instead of Mizzou
No, arguing for wildcards means, simply, you take the 5 conference champs, and then the best 3 remaining teams. That recognizes that some conferences are stronger than others. It has nothing to do with whether there's a conference championship.

But yes, this season, if there were 8 teams, I would consider Miss St as a wildcard over Mizzou (although given the Ole Miss loss, they might be looking at 8th). And also, if Mizzou had won last night, I'd consider Alabama.

Alabama- Michigan St (or Cinderella; Marshall or Boise)
Fla St- Miss St
Oregon-TCU
Baylor-Ohio State

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter